A few nights ago, on his radio show, Matt Drudge played a clip of filmmaker David Lynch talking on Dutch television about several 9/11 conspiracy theories, such as how the towers crumbled like a controlled demolition project, or that the size of the hole in the Pentagon was allegedly too small to have been created by a Boeing 757. Unsurprisingly, Drudge berated him for even considering the theories. I don't remember exactly what he said, but it was your basic, right-wing, reactionary, "don't-question-authority" rant you would expect from a Matt Drudge type.
I don't normally subscribe to conspiracy theories. Honestly, I find your typical conspiracy theorist about as engaging as a stripped clutch plate. But I recognize their value. The conspiracy movement is a vital organ of any healthy republic, and it really just sucks the snot right out of my eyeballs whenever I hear conspiracy theorists being maligned like that.
As I said, I am no conspiracy theorist. I rarely suspect my government of conspiratorial monkeyshines. I'm probably the only guy left on Earth who still believes Area 51 is just an innocent government installation that engages in perfectly normal, top-secret military undertakings. But the very fact that I am not a suspicious person is exactly why I thank God for conspiracy theorists. They are ever vigilant, ever watching our backs, ever worrying about attacks on my liberty so I don't have to.
Yes, of course, I understand the inclination to dismiss conspiracy theorists. I know they're as much fun to have around as an empty bag of bean sprouts, but, still, is mocking them any way to say thank you? If it weren't for conspiracy theorists, we'd all still think Nixon was a great president and Soylent Green is made from cucumber pulp and whey concentrate. What I'm trying to say is: Don't be a Conspiracy Theorist Hater.
The Conspiracy Theorist Hater's first response to a conspiracy theory is to mock it. He will not consider it. He will not explore the possibility of a conspiracy. He will trample on the idea so he doesn't have to think about the painful possibility, as Drudge did.
The second thing he will do, as surely as cows don't make crop circles, is to pose the argument that a conspiracy this enormous would be impossible to pull off.
"How could it be possible," they ask, "that all those witnesses, and all the investigators, and the scientists, and engineers, and the victims families--whose testimonies all add up to the fact that 9/11 was an external, terrorist attack--could they all be conspiring to lie about it?"
Well, don't act like it can't happen. Don't act like it hasn't already happened, countless times in history, or that it isn't happening now, somewhere else in the world. Indeed, even right here in America. I mean, aren't Americans, with the aid of about half the planet, the purveyors of the largest, most all-consuming conspiracies ever conceived?:
The Santa Conspiracy.
We just pulled it off again, a few days ago, on Dec. 25, when a quatrillion kids came running down the stairs to embrace the biggest lie of their little lives. I'm not making a judgment about whether it's right or wrong to let children believe in Santa. I'm just focusing on the sheer scale of it. Think about the planning and preparation and cooperation it takes to uphold the sham that is the existence of Santa Claus. And everybody's in on it, like a bad Twilight Zone. I mean, here you are, 10 years old, just la la la-ing along in your life, unaware that everyone is lying to you. Not just your parents, which is devastating all by itself, but also your aunts and uncles, and all your friends' parents, and their relatives, and the mailman, and the nice lady who cuts your hair, and the police, and the president, and Congress, and the media--they're all conspiring to keep you from knowing the real true truth about Santa Claus.
Et tu, media?
You'd think there'd be at least be one rogue journalist who'd write that searing exposé for Highlights magazine. I can see the headline: "Santa a Farce: Toys Made by Planet-Raping Corporations."
It's a conspiracy so deep they even got to Hollywood which is why you never see that blockbuster motion-picture trailer with the guy with the movie voice saying, "In a world corrupted by deception, two boys set out to find the answer to a question that would tear apart a nation: The Da Santa Code--opening at a theater near you."
So if it's this easy to get so many people to collude on a conspiracy of this size for no other reason than to make children happy, then can you imagine how easy it would be to get them to collude for reasons of greed and power?
No, I'm no conspiracy theorist, but conspiracies ain't as hard to pull off as some people think they are. And if Matt Drudge believes it preposterous that a government could mass murder its own citizens to retain power and wealth, well, then isn't he just the ideal citizen of that government?
Remember what I've told you people. Remember it the next time a conspiracy theorist takes the stool next to you and bends your ear about how our government is using Area 51 to manufacture bombs that kill people but leave Christmas decorations standing. Remember and nod your head in agreement and say, "Thanks, man! Thanks for keeping an eye on that Area 51 for me. I wanted to get out there but I've been a little busy lately." Then buy that conspiracy theorist a drink, then another, and another, until he falls off his stool or passes out (conspiracy theorists are lightweights). Then back him up one more drink and walk out into the night satisfied in the knowledge that you were able to contribute in your own little way.
Photo "borrowed" from http://www.911digitalarchive.org/
Hope they're cool with it.
EJD
12/26/06
Comments (4)
Hi Ed.
Watch 9/11: Press For Truth. Available for free online.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5589099104255077250
Incidentally Ed... the reason I [sent you that link] was because the information covered in it, is the foundation for the 9/11 Truth Movement. You may think it's Loose Change, but unfortunately, we couldn't control which film came out first. We didn't decide to get involved with this one day because we thought it would be exciting, and interesting. We got involved because of the obvious cover-ups regarding the attacks of 9/11, and because the families deserved better than what they got. I was hoping you would give a more favorable write-up in regards to the 9/11 Truth Movement after watching that film.
Posted by Jon | December 29, 2006 12:36 AM
Posted on December 29, 2006 00:36
I recently had an opportunity to read your "Sordid
Tales" article published in the San Diego CityBeat.
Your analysis of the conspiracy movement was dead
center in my opinion. In some respects I fit into the
conspiracy category, but on a host of other subjects I
side with your camp, in the fact that I feel safe
knowing there are those ensuring things don't get too
out of hand. I'm sure you're a busy person, but if
you have a moment to write me back I'd love to hear
your response to the following comment...Currently I
am seeking a journalism degree, in many respects I
feel the media has done a dis-favor to society by
feeding the public what the "global elite" wants them
to hear. As a journalist, however, to have
competitive voice I'm assuming you have to feed the
elitists message occasionally, my question is, how do
you balance telling the truth with what the
powers-that-be want you to say? Thanks for your time!
Andrew
Posted by andrew | December 29, 2006 12:49 AM
Posted on December 29, 2006 00:49
I glanced at the 9-11 piece to see where you were going with it. All
wrong! Don't waste space talking about Drudge talking about something.
Take your head out of your ass and look at Terrorstorm or Loose
Change. They are done slowly and carefully so that anyone can understand
them. If you get hung up on some part use the reverse to go over it again.
Then do a 9-11 editorial on what you now think. Roy, San Diego
Posted by roy | December 29, 2006 12:50 AM
Posted on December 29, 2006 00:50
Ed,
I enjoyed your article on 9/11 and Drudge. My opinion re 9/11 is
that some of the facts warrant our attention and have gone past
just conspiracy rantings. I too am not a conspiracy wacko but some
of the issues have attracted my attention. One is WTC7. How did
this 47 story building come down at around 5pm in what looks like
an exact controlled demolition? What about the free fall speed of
all 3 buildings. That cannot happen if they pancaked. What caused
the pulverization to dust of the concrete. Take a look at this
movie - its a shame its coming from Google UK - but what the heck!
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4488542891415681105
Simon
P.S. I am a computer/electronics specialist and know little about
buildings but I do operate on logic and have expert level trouble
shootings skills. I believe there is something terribly wrong with
the whole 9/11 issue as it has thus far been presented.
Posted by simon | December 29, 2006 12:53 AM
Posted on December 29, 2006 00:53