Comments on: Infidelity Mulligan

By: Gayle

Gayle — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:11:24 +0000

You had me mildly pissed off, until the twist at the end, irony fully accepted, thankgod. Up to that point you suddenly sounded like you’d been reading the Old Testament too often, perhaps too much time spent you know where. Because i think it’s important for women to be comfortable bringing men home . Actually, what really pissed me off is that the UT published the whole TWs scandal on the front page! Isn’t that where news belongs? Poor TW needed to be placed in arts&entertainment (“currents”?) where one hopes and expects to read about infidelities, usually in Ann Landers & co. Hey, I heard As the World Turns got canceled today. THAT’s why the U-T is keeping up front page tiger-with-a-white-woman-in-his-tank stories. Keep it up, Ed! Keep pushing the edge!

By: Dennis

Dennis — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:43:04 +0000

That penguin picture makes me sad…

By: edwin

edwin — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:45:53 +0000

Nothing’s left V., that’s the whole point. If she’s gonna cheat on me she’s just going to have to make do with handjobs with Eskimos on the Arctic ice shelf. Enough of this now, i’m off to the brothel!!

By: edwin

edwin — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:43:33 +0000

it already has worked Karyl, it already has…

By: Karyl Miller

Karyl Miller — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:20:20 +0000

Edwin,
If this is your way of trying to get into my panties, it’s not going to work.

By: Scottycakes

Scottycakes — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:42:40 +0000

Ed,
When I go to bed tonight, I will be sure to thank Thoth and Bes for their contribution to your Men’s #4.
“purchasing expensive gifts for your mistress, such as jewelry or breast enhancements, is expressly forbidden. That money should be spent on cleaning and cooking appliances for your wife”.

By: Vince

Vince — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:59:19 +0000

Decker, you american-value-underminer you! Tongue placed firmly in cheek and bitten down upon. Great job, pal. But the women’s mulligans rules of no oral, no anal, no vaginal….NO VAGINAL? What’s left? I know you’re up for a clever answer. HA!

V-

By: edwin

edwin — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:10:01 +0000

Actually, Colleen, W. was all for it. In fact, this whole column was her idea.

You ladies should know, the part at the end, the part that screws women out of their Infidelity Mulligans, was intended to be self-deprecating humor. I meant it to poke fun at the fragile and hypocritical male ego.

It was a late addition to the column. In the first draft, women were going to get the same Infidelity Mulligan rights as men, but I changed it cuz it seemed funnier to me this way. W. agreed. In reality however, I am in favor of the mulligan going both ways (hey, a bisexual mulligan – love it!)

By: Colleen

Colleen — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:56 +0000

I have to agree w/ Jilly although I would venture to say they are very stiff. (Ha “stiff” my mind wanders elsewhere…)
I’d love to hear what “W” has to say about your rules for women.
Don’t have a problem w/ the sharing of partners so long as both people in the relationship is in agreement.
Great to see you haven’t lost your sense of humor though Ed.
Have to agree with you though Ed on Carlos…

By: BAJ

BAJ — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:10:40 +0000

)) What you gotta do here, Ed, is switch the women’s rules to the men and let us females have the men’s rules. ))

See you at the SCWC*SD, buddy! ))