Archive for the ‘(patriotism/politics)’ Category

Star Spangled Poem

Thursday, July 7th, 2011


I love the Fourth of July. I am totally down with celebrating our country’s independence from British imperialism. The only thing I can’t stand about this particular holiday is the excessive playing of patriotic music.

Not that I have anything against patriot songs, as a concept—they just tend to be artless bursts of propaganda and often downright false. Now, it is true that sometimes I worry that I think this way about national anthems because my soul is a cold, black, petrified chunk of coughed-up lung cancer, but I just spent the last couple of days perusing the anthems of the world at Nationalanthems.info, and it confirmed my suspicions: Most national anthems are enormous pieces of patriotic caca.

You know how these things go: Every country is the best country. Every motherland is the most beautiful, inhabited by the bravest and most industrious people, who are loved by God more than anyone else. And they all have passages about opposing tyranny from other countries, which is funny when you think about it because, if all the countries are fighting tyranny, then which countries are doing the tyrannizing? Well, all of them, of course! (more…)

Share

A Line in the Sand

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

The first thing I thought—when I heard about the backlash surrounding the Jerry Brown campaign staffer who called his opponent, Meg Whitman, a “whore”—was: What’s this now?! “Whore” is an offensive epithet? That’s news to me.

Apparently, Whitman had been offering pension-reform exemptions to California law-enforcement unions in exchange for their support, which prompted the staffer in question to use the word in question. Then, during the last debate, moderator Tom Brokaw asked Brown why he had not admonished the staffer for using a term that, Brokaw said, “many women have compared to the N-word.”

Brown replied that he did not agree with the N-word comparison but wouldn’t elaborate. “I don’t want to get into the term and how it’s used,” he said before issuing a second apology.

Well, if Brown doesn’t want to “get into the term and how it’s used,” I will, because I’m sick of so many words being arbitrarily removed from the lexicon without any real analysis of what they mean, whom they affect and why. If I’m to be expected to stop using the W- word—a word that has brought me overwhelming joy and ebullient laughter throughout the years—there had damn well better be a good reason. I intend to prove that no such reason exists. Consider it my line in the sand. (more…)

Share

Indoctrination Outrage Theater

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

indoctrination outrage theater

When President Barack Obama gave a speech last month that was written for the school children of America, certain politicians and pundits threw a fit.

Jim Greer, the Florida GOP chairman, called the speech “liberal propaganda.” Fox News commentHater Glenn Beck said the president’s goal is the “indoctrination of children.” The list goes on.

And what were these detestable messages being propagandized by President Obama (or, as I call it, prObamaganda)? Do your homework, stay in school, apply yourself—you know, the kind of ideas that could destroy a society should they ever catch on. (more…)

Share

Patriot Songs
(which to include or exclude at your next 4th of July Barbecue iPod Mix

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

leegreenwood_informationfin

I always recoil at how many awful, patriot-type songs people allow into their Fourth of July barbecue iPod mixes, especially when there are so many great anthems to choose from. This year was no different. What follows is a list of songs commonly heard on Independence Day. I will analyze each and determine whether you should include or exclude them from your barbecue playlist next year. (more…)

Share

Of Retarded Retards

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

newtgrump_300

“I am not a citizen of the world. I think the entire concept is intellectual nonsense and  stunningly dangerous!” —Newt Gingrich

Wow, Newt, you really are a retard.

Now, it should be noted that I do not intend for the word “retard” to be insulting to our mentally handicapped brothers and sisters (Newt gives retards a bad name); rather, “retarded” is meant in its truer, original sense, as in, “regressive,” “stunted” and / or “expressing non-progressive thinking or behavior.” Because that’s exactly what this is—yet another flailing neo-conservative, detached from power and still clinging to the same, goonish, approach to global affairs that nearly ruined us in the first place. (more…)

Share

Sarah-Speak

Friday, October 17th, 2008

sarahspeak3.jpg

“All of them, any of them that have been in front of me over the years…with a great appreciation for the press, the media.” (Sarah Palin, when asked to name a newspaper she reads.)

Never have I heard such duplicitous poppycock in the political arena as from vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

This is the woman who claimed to have foreign-policy experience because she can see Russia from Alaska, said the causes of global warming are unimportant to the solution and insulted Joe Biden for being old (um, hello? John McCain, hello?) and then spun it as a compliment.

(more…)

Share

Gitmo-a-go-go

Friday, June 27th, 2008

Props to the U.S. Supreme Court for making the right decision regarding Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, et al.

This was the case about whether the Geneva Conventions apply to prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay. The Bush administration argued that the Gitmo detainees were not, technically, prisoners of war and, therefore, not eligible for Geneva protections.
At issue in the case was habeas corpus, the requirement that the government show legitimate reason to detain someone. Thanks to this ruling, the prisoners of Guantanamo Bay have come another step closer to receiving the same legal protections as you and me.

Fukken-A!

Now, I really hadn’t planned on writing about this decision. It seems so utterly obvious why Guantanamo Bay detainees deserve due process; I just figured it would be argued, re-argued and over-argued a million times in the opinionsphere before I could ever publish a single word about it.

Instead, I watched and listened as the right-wing blubbermongers blubbered on about how the court’s decision puts the rights of foreign terrorists above the safety of Americans, that terrorists aren’t deserving of habeas corpus because of their heinous actions and that the decision will cost American lives because the terrorists will all stampede out of Guantanamo like horses running from a burning stable.

(more…)

Share

Spreading Democracy

Monday, November 12th, 2007

I heard it again–that phrase, that phrase, that awful phrase that I hate so much. It was spoken on The O’Reilly Factor. The panel was discussing Iraq in their typical fair and maliced manner, when one of them uttered the unutterable: He said the war in Iraq is necessary because we are “spreading democracy” in the region.

Spreading democracy?

I remember the first time I heard those words. It was during President Bush’s 2005 inaugural address: “It is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture…. We’re spreading democracy.”

(more…)

Share

Stars and Gripes
(Considering the sanity of the U.S. Flag Code)

Thursday, October 18th, 2007

mexflag.jpg

Probably by now you’ve heard of the U.S. Army veteran named Jim Broussard who recently cut down a couple of flags above a Reno bar because the bar owner (a Mexican-American) was flying a Mexican flag above the Stars and Stripes.

When Broussard heard about this abomination, he marched down to the Cantina El Jaripeo and–with television cameras rolling–cut down both flags. He tossed the Mexican flag on the ground, raised the U.S. flag to the camera and blurted, “I’m Jim Broussard, and I took this flag down in honor of my country.” Then he ranted for a few more moments and ended by saying that the bar owner would have to fight to get his flag back.

Now, it is true that the flag code prohibits flying the U.S. flag below any other.

Naturally, there has been much discussion about whether Broussard’s actions were patriotic or criminal, but I think an even better question is, “Should flying another flag above the U.S. flag even be illegal in the first place?”

(more…)

Share

Amanda Republic
(Dissecting the Pledge of Allegiance)

Sunday, April 8th, 2007

pledgeallegiance3.JPG

The exhausting debate over whether the phrase “Under God,” belongs in the Pledge is a potent distraction from the real problem with this thing. The real problem with the Pledge of Allegiance is that we have a Pledge of Allegiance in the first place.

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.” The whole thing seems a little Orwellian for my taste: The systematic programming of American Youth, the assembly-lining of an idea, the pressure to conform – it’s all there. What’s worse, we are asking children to pledge to an entity about which they know very little: These kids know nothing about foreign policy, nothing about history, or war, or death. They don’t even know the words of the pledge. (more…)

Share

The Santa Conspiracy
(Coming to the defense of conspiracy theorists)

Friday, December 29th, 2006

world_trade_center.JPG

A few nights ago, on his radio show, Matt Drudge played a clip of filmmaker David Lynch talking on Dutch television about several 9/11 conspiracy theories, such as how the towers crumbled like a controlled demolition project, or that the size of the hole in the Pentagon was allegedly too small to have been created by a Boeing 757.

Unsurprisingly, Drudge berated him for even considering the theories. I don’t remember exactly what he said, but it was your basic, right-wing, reactionary, “don’t-question-authority” rant you would expect from a Matt Drudge type.

(more…)

Share

The Meaning of Cinco de Mayo
(Blaming America First Since 1776)

Monday, April 24th, 2006

I was sitting on a bar stool at the Tilted Stick with a gut-full of tequila eavesdropping on a conversation the young couple beside me was having about Cinco de Mayo. The girl asked what the holiday was all about and the guy replied that ‘Cinco de Mayo’ was Spanish for ‘May 5.’

“It’s the anniversary of the day Mexico declared independence from Spain,” he proclaimed.

Being the sort of person who hates to see the spread of misinformation, I leaned in and interrupted his spiel. “Actually that’s not true,” I said. “Mexico’s independence came decades earlier.”

“No it didn’t,” he insisted. “I heard it on the radio today. Cinco De Mayo is the Mexican version of our 4th of July.”

And so it began.

What started as a chinwag about Cinco de Mayo soon turned into an argument about Mexican beers, which became an outburst about border control, and finally skid into a tirade about terrorism.

I just love this sort of barroom encounter. All the components for disaster are there: Two guys jawing over a highly sensitive subject with a gut-full of booze, a sack-full of testosterone, a young pretty on the sidelines, and just one wrong-word away from trading punches across the bar – that’s the adrenalin that tastes like crack.

His take on terrorism was that terrorists are terrible and should be terminated.

“That’s one way to look at it,” I said.

“What’s the other,” he snorted.

“What is our culpability in the rise of terrorism today?” I replied. “Is there any truth to the idea that America is immorally wielding it’s might upon the Middle East and if so, should we be surprised when they lash out against us?”

“I see,” he said with a condescending tone. “You’re one of those Blame-America-First jerks.”

And there it was – The Label. What barroom argument is complete without somebody casting a label? And this one is a classic: It’s as illogical, unreasonable, unfounded, insensitive, and entirely unoriginal as a label can be. Have you heard it? If you watch cable news or listen to radio talk shows they say it all the time:

They call it the “Blame-America-First crowd”; as if there’s an organized group out there somewhere with a headquarters, and a website, and a mission statement, and some punchy acronym like BAFA: the Blame America Firsters of America – Blaming Americans first since 1776.

Yeah right. BAFA is just another of a myriad of phrases that is meant to marginalize anyone who criticizes the oh-so perfect United States. It’s a self-defense mechanism that insulates America from its wicked deeds and shields Americans from ever having to confront them.

“You know what?” I said. “I’d rather be a Blame-America-First jerk than a Blame-America-Last ass. You Blame-America-Last asses are the worst. You never blame America, except when it’s last. Slavery, Vietnam, Iran-Contra, LAPD, Bay of Pigs, Richard Nixon, Omarosa, even Christopher Columbus, it’s no goddam wonder we keep making the same mistakes over and over again – because we won’t admit to making them in the first place?

How can anyone evolve when they don’t accept personal responsibility?

This is why this guy will never learn the meaning of Cinco de Mayo. Because it’s inconceivable to him that he might be wrong about something and is therefore doomed to repeat the same misinformation to hot girls in bars across America.

Incidentally, I did look up Cinco de Mayo when I got home and it definitely ain’t the Mexican Independence Day. May 5, 1862 is the date of Mexico’s victory over the French at the Battle of Puebla. It was your classic underdog vs. the overdog conflict. A rumbustious mix of Mexican soldiers, peasants, Indians, a few hundred heads of stampeding cattle, and a band of farmers armed with hoes and shovels defended the City of Puebla from Napoleon III’s vastly superior French army.

The victory, however, was symbolic. Mexico may have won the battle, but they never had a prayer in the war. The French regrouped and effortlessly pirouetted across the country. And the reason France was able to conquer Mexico so easily, was thanks to the good old unblamable United States of America – and her greed, and opportunism, and expansionist obsessions, and Manifest Destiny, and a little conflict we call the Mexican/American war that occurred some 17 years before the battle of Cinco de Mayo.

President James K. Polk and the landthirsty people of the United States of America were under the impression that God had given them the right to take over Mexico. Many wanted the U.S. to take all of Mexico. But being the givers that Americans are, we only stole half of it – which devastated the Mexican treasury and opened the door for a French occupation.

So who started the Mexican American war? Well, it’s true that Mexico fired the first shot. But they did so because the Americans were amassing a force on Mexico’s side of the border. Naturally, that part of the story was played down by the Americans. And how did they play it down? By labeling you a traitor if you dared suggest that Mexico had a legitimate reason shoot first; or insinuate that we don’t have a divine right to occupy their land; or shouted from the rooftops with a bullhorn, “You’re all mad, mad I tell you, if you really believe God is behind this Manifest Larceny business!”

Get this: Later it was learned that the Polk had planned on attacking Mexico before Mexico ever fired that first shot. How serendipitous for Polk. He just used the attack as justification to declare war and then it was an all out property grab to which America came out on top.

Hmm. Sound familiar? Can you think of any other Presidents who may have used attacks against us to justify a war he already had planned? Isn’t it uncanny how history continues to repeat? But as long as we keep blaming America last, then we’re doomed to repeat our mistakes first.

For the record, I don’t consider myself a Blame-America-First person. Sometimes I blame America second, or third even. Sometimes I don’t blame America at all.  If you have to put a label on me, then I guess I’m a Blame-America-When-America-Deserves-to-be-Blamed Blamer. And I’m really fucking tired of being called a traitor every time I question my government out loud. It’s called “Introspection” people and for the life of me I don’t know when it became a bad thing.

EJD

Share

The Federal Department of Supporting the Troops a Lot

Thursday, March 10th, 2005

federaldepartment_swat.jpg
Tuesday:
They took Mrs. Bloomingberger today. I was washing a rack of dishes and could see through the kitchen window as the Support the Troops Police marched up to her apartment, bashed down the door and dragged the poor old gal away. They said she didn’t support The Troops enough. (more…)

Share